|
|
Overview of Egypt's Regional Trade Agreements
1-Pan-Arab Free Trade Area
(PAFTA)
The Pan-Arab Free Trade Area was established by the
Arab League’s Economic and Social Council on 19th
February 1997 by its Resolution No 1317, aiming at
enhancing joint economic gains to Arab States and
benefit from developments in world trade and the
establishment of regional and international economic
blocks.
Currently 17 members of the Arab League are
participating in the FTA, with Algeria just
finalising the administrative procedures to become
the 18th member (expected by the end of 2005).
Market Access: Tariff dismantling for all industrial
and agricultural products started in January 1997
with a 10% customs duties reduction and finalised on
1st January 2005 with a final 20% customs duties
reductions. Currently all products meeting the
transitional rules of origin (products should have
at least 40% Arab component) can access members'
markets duty-free.
Only 6 Member States (incl. Egypt) presented
negative lists with products exempted from tariff
dismantling, but they were valid for a maximum of 4
years and expired in September 2002. However, three
of the countries (Morocco, Tunisia and Egypt) have
added some administrative procedures for textiles
products in order to obtain duty-free market access.
These measures are considered as non-tariff barriers
by the Arab League, who clearly stated that they
should be removed.
PAFTA Structure: The PAFTA Agreement is administered
by the Arab League’s Economic and Social Council
(EcoSoc) with high officials meeting, at least
2x/year. Under the AL EcoSoc, there is one Committee
on RoO, and one on NTB, also meeting 2-3x/year.
Dispute Settlement procedures have already been
finalised. A focal point has been appointed in each
MS responsible for dealing with complaints or
problems faced by MS companies. If no solution is
reached by the focal points, then the EcoSoc will
act as arbitrator, if this fails, it goes to the
Arab League Court for investment and trade problems.
Current work: The Committee on RoO is currently
working in the establishment of detailed RoO. The
General Framework has already been endorsed by the
EcoSoc and the RoO on agricultural products will be
presented in the July meeting for endorsement. The
expert group is currently working on the RoO for
industrial products, which should be finalised by
the end of 2005 and presented to the EcoSoc for
endorsement. The possibility to adopt the
Pan-Euro-Med RoO as PAFTA RoO was initially
discussed, but no agreement reached.
The Committee on NTB is analysing the different
customs procedures, import/export documents and
costs related to customs clearance aiming at
harmonising them in order to enhance trade and
investments in the region.
In addition, the Arab League has recently launched
an initiative on services liberalisation and nine
countries (Egypt, Morocco, Jordan, Lebanon and the
Gulf countries) have started the process with the
submission of an offer. The next step should be the
opening of bilateral negotiations between these
countries. Five have already opened bilateral
negotiations (Egypt, Lebanon, Oman, Jordan and
Kuwait) and Morocco is expected to do so soon. All
bilateral offers should be GATS+.
The Arab League will at some point also work on an
upgrading of PAFTA into a Customs Union (after 5-6
years).
For more details contact Mr. Kamal Senada, Head of
the General Department for Economic Affairs at the
Arab League. Tel: +20-2-575-2998, Ext 3610. Email:
eldinsinada@gmail.com
2-AGADIR Agreement
In the Barcelona Declaration, the Euromed partners
agreed on the establishment of a Euro-Mediterranean
Free Trade Area (EMFTA) by 2010. This is to be
achieved by means of Association Agreements with the
EU and the Med partners, together with free trade
agreements between the partners themselves.
In this context, Morocco, Tunisia, Jordan and Egypt
declared in May 2001 their intention to set-up a
Free Trade Area among themselves towards the
creation of the EMFTA by 2010. The Agreement was
finally signed by the four members on 25th February
2004 and is still awaiting ratification from Morocco
to enter into force.
Goals: Total elimination of customs tariffs by
01.01.2006, the harmonisation of laws in economic
matters; invigoration of trade exchanges; promotion
of industrial texture, economic activities and
employment; improvement of productivity and living
standards; coordination of sectorial and global
economic policies, especially in the fields of
foreign trade, agriculture, industry, finance, taxes
and customs.
AGADIR Structure: The agreement is governed by four
different bodies: The Committee of the Ministers of
Foreign Affairs (defines political procedures for
the development of the agreement), the Committee of
the Ministers of Foreign Trade (supervises
implementation and defines the means to reinforce
cooperation and integration), the Technical
Committee (follows-up the implementation of the
agreement and dispute settlements) and the Technical
Unit (based in Amman, ensures the follow-up of the
implementation of the agreement and resolutions of
the Committees of the Ministers of Foreign Affairs
and Foreign Trade)
Rules of Origin: A key element of the agreement is
the adoption of the pan-euro-med protocol as the one
governing Rules of Origin, allowing countries to
benefit from diagonal cumulation. Products coming
from Morocco, Tunisia or Jordan will be considered
as originating in Egypt, provided that the working
or processing carried out in Egypt goes beyond the
operations considered to be insufficient working or
processing, according to Article 7 of the
pan-euro-med protocol .
This means Tunisia could use Egyptian fabrics to
produce Tunisian read-made garments that will enter
the EU duty-free. At the same time, Egypt could use
components originating in Morocco or Jordan to
produce a machine, which will have Egyptian origin
and duty-free access to the EU.
Once the Agreement is ratified by Morocco and the
pan-euro-med protocol on RoO is transposed into each
one of the bilateral Associations Agreements with
the EU, the four members will be able to cumulate
between them.
For more details contact the Amman-based Technical
Unit for the implementation of the Agreement.
3-QIZ Protocol
Qualifying Industrial Zones (QIZ) are geographically
designated areas in Egypt determined by the Egyptian
government and approved by the US government where
industrial products originated in Egypt and
satisfying a minimum 11.7% Israeli content are
granted duty-free entry into the U.S. customs
territories.
QIZ was first introduced in 1996, when the U.S.
Congress, aiming at reinforcing peace in the Middle
East, issued decree 6955, which authorized duty-free
entry into the U.S. for the industrial products
manufactured jointly with Israel and originated in
Egypt or Jordan. In 1999, Jordan reached a protocol
to enforce the above-mentioned decree.
Having observed the positive economic results of the
QIZ protocol with Jordan and bracing for the phasing
out of the quantitative quotas on textile (The WTO
Agreement on Textile and Clothing, ATC) that posed a
great threat to the international competitiveness of
the Egyptian textile and ready-made garment
industry, the Egyptian Government decided to
negotiate a QIZ protocol, which was signed between
the three parties on 14 December 2004.
The QIZ initiative does not have any expiration
date. It does not need to be renewed by Congress
every few years like the Generalized System of
Preferences (GSP) or other trade legislation.
QIZ Advantages: The QIZ initiative currently grants
immediate tariff and quota-free access to the U.S.
market to goods “substantially transformed” that are
produced in the Qualified Industrial Zones and meet
specific rules of origin requirements. Therefore,
the immediate saving is the amount of the U.S.
tariff on any specified good. Generally speaking,
U.S. tariffs on clothing and textile goods are
relatively high, which makes production of these
goods in QIZs especially attractive.
Requirements: In order to benefit from the duty-free
access to the US market, there are certain
requirements that should be met by Egyptian
companies:
1- Companies should be located in one of the
approved Qualified Industrial Zones. There are
currently seven QIZs: four in Greater Cairo (Shubra
Al Kheima, Nasr City, 10th of Ramadan City, South
Giza and 15th of May City), two in Greater
Alexandria (Borg el Arab and Alexandria), and one in
Port Said. In addition, there are five factories
outside the QIZs also qualified for exporting free
of customs duties to the US: Cairo Cotton, Dice,
E.T.C., Samir Flannels, and Delta.
2- Companies within a QIZ should be registered first
at the QIZ Unit created by the Egyptian Ministry of
Foreign Trade and Industry. The QIZ Joint Committee
is the authority responsible for issuing a QIZ
certificate, valid for a period of one year,
recognizing that the company is located within a
QIZ.
3- The sum of materials and direct costs of
processing a final product in a QIZ and Israel shall
be at least 35% of the product’s value (ex factory
price). At least one third of this percentage
(11.7%) should come from an Israeli component. In
this regard, not only inputs, but also services such
as Technical Assistance provided by an Israeli
company or transportation costs will count on the
calculation of the Israeli minimum content.
Registered firms: There are currently 464 companies
approved to manufacture and export to the US under
the QIZ Agreement, located mainly in Alexandria and
10th of Ramadan QIZs (28% of total companies each).
By industry, textile and ready-made garments
companies are way ahead any other sector, accounting
for almost 80% of total approved companies, followed
by foodstuff and base metals manufacturers (3% of
total companies each).
QIZ unit in MoFTI: In addition to effectively
administrate all terms and aspects of the QIZ
Protocol, verifying that companies are complying
with the rules governing the Agreement, the Unit is
in the process of providing a range of services to
maximize the value that companies can obtain from
it. In this regard, the Unit will focus on promoting
local and foreign direct investments, providing
matchmaking for companies seeking partners (a key
issue taking into account that only 40% of the
approved companies have well established export
relations with the US and there were almost no
business relations with Israel) and supporting trade
and industrial policies and corporate decision
making.
The Unit is also trying to promote those sectors
which, due to high US customs duties, could gain a
price advantage over competing producers and where
US imports in high volumes. In addition to textiles,
food and beverages, leather products, footwear and
glassware have been identified as sectors that could
maximize the benefits of the Protocol in the short
term.
Egypt vs Jordan: There two major differences between
the Jordanian QIZ Protocol and the Egyptian one in
terms of implementation: the minimum Israeli content
and the verification of its compliance by a company.
In the case of Jordan, the compliance with the
minimum Israeli component is verified on a
product-by-product basis, meaning that each unit
exported to the US needs to have a minimum 8%
Israeli component. In the Egyptian QIZ this
compliance is verified on a quarterly basis for each
factory, which means that an Egyptian company could
export 100% Egyptian consignments as long as they
use a minimum 11.7% Israeli component on their total
quarterly exports.
A first audit of the fulfilment of the Protocol's
rules by approved companies will be carried out on
15th July 2005. Egyptian companies are supposed to
police themselves and follow the rules, as
self-declaration is possible and only spot checks
will be carried out by US customs (US Embassy has
recognised that it will be difficult for their
customs to verify if QIZ requirements are fulfilled
by Egyptian companies).
For more details visit the QIZ Unit Website:
www.qizegypt.gov.eg or contact MrAli Awni, Head of
the QIZ Unit. Tel: +20-2-792-11-77. Email:
ali.awni@mfti.gov.eg
4 Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa
(COMESA)
COMESA was established in December 1994 to replace
the former Preferential Trade Area (PTA) which had
existed since 1981. COMESA was established as an
organisation of states which have agreed to
co-operate in developing their natural and human
resources. Its main focus is on the formation of a
large economic and trading unit capable of
overcoming some of the barriers that are faced by
individual states.
The FTA was achieved on 31st October, 2000, when
nine of the member States, namely Djibouti, Egypt,
Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Sudan, Zambia
and Zimbabwe eliminated their tariffs on COMESA
originating products, in accordance with the tariff
reduction schedule adopted in 1992 for the gradual
removal of tariffs in intra-COMESA trade. Burundi
and Rwanda joined the FTA on 1st January, 2004.
Rules of Origin: Goods eligible for duty-free
treatment under the COMESA FTA are those that meet
the COMESA RoO. Goods acquire originating status if
they meet any of the following requirements:
• Goods are wholly produced or obtained in a member
State; or
• Imported materials used in the production of final
good does not exceed 60% of the total cost of all
materials used in their production; or
• A minimum of 35% domestic value added of the
ex-factory cost of the goods is achieved; or
• If goods produced in member States are classified
after the manufacturing process under a tariff
heading other than the one under which they were
imported; or
• A minimum of 25% domestic value added of the
ex-factory cost of the goods is achieved for goods
of particular importance to the economic development
of the member States.
Article 45 of the COMESA Treaty requires Member
States to establish a Customs Union over a
transitional period of ten years from the entry into
force of the Treaty. In preparation for this Customs
Union, the Eleventh Meeting of the Council of
Ministers held in Cairo, adopted a Road Map that
outlined programmes and activities whose
implementation was necessary before the launching of
the Union. A significant amount of work has been
undertaken to date, regarding the common tariff
nomenclature (based on the International Harmonised
System of 2002), common valuation system (15 Member
States have already adopted the WTO Valuation
Agreement as their customs valuation system),
customs rules and procedures (Customs Management Act
adopted by members) and elimination of non-tariff
barriers (adoption of a programme for relaxation and
elimination of non-tariff barriers)
While there is agreement on the Common External
Tariff (CET) target rates for capital goods (0%) and
raw materials (0%), work is ongoing on rates for
intermediate and finished products. With regard to
the rates for intermediate products, many of which
are direct inputs for industry, there is a need to
define a rate that will ensure industrial
competitiveness. In that regard, an exercise is
ongoing that will provide for exceptions, exclusions
and derogations. With regard to the rates for
finished products, there is agreement to harmonise
tariffs in the range of 25-40%.
For more details visit COMESA Website:
www.comesa.int
|