|
INTERIM REPORT ON AN EU STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP
WITH THE MEDITERRANEAN AND THE MIDDLE EAST
1. Introduction
Mandate
The December 2003 European Council asked the Presidency and SG/HR, in
co-ordination with the Commission, to present concrete proposals on a
strategy towards the region of the Middle East. This paper addresses
this question and the related mandate from the European Council on
developing relations with the Arab world.
Purpose of this Report
The purpose of this interim report is threefold:
-
to give an
overview of discussions on the strategy to date
-
to present
an analysis of the EU’s current engagement with the region and flag key
upcoming developments
-
to suggest
core elements for a strategy on a common partnership with the region, to
set out an agenda for consultation with our partners in the region and
to provide guidance for discussions with other external actors in the
coming three months.
Progress to date
This first phase in developing an EU Strategy has been used primarily to
explore the views of EU partners on this issue. Since December there
have been eight substantive discussions: in Working Groups (COMAG/COMEM),
by Political Directors, at the Political and Security Committee, at
COREPER and at the GAERC on 23 February. Fourteen EU partners have
submitted formal papers. In addition the Commission and HR/SG have
contributed inputs.
It is envisaged that the next phase (April-June 2004) will be directed
primarily at consulting with the partners in the region. This point is
key. EU relations with our partners in the region have been built on
consultation. There is a view in the region that its perspectives have
not been fully taken into account in the development of the current
initiative. While there has already been contact with partners in the
region at both official and political level, the period up to the
European Council in June 2004 will provide a vital platform for active
consultation with the countries of the region. This paper proposes a
set of objectives and the development of Work Programmes, which might be
the basis for consultation with the region.
There have been a number of important developments in recent months in
respect of the region. These include the development of this strategy,
the creation of the Neighbourhood policy, the mandate from the Naples
EuroMediterranean Ministerial meeting, other proposals by individual EU
member states and the Greater Middle East initiative of the United
States.
The Union should use the period ahead to explain the objectives and the
opportunities of the EU’s strategy and to develop a sense of shared
ownership of it by our partners in the region.
Following this period of consultation it is envisaged that the EU
strategy and the means to implement it will be adopted at the European
Council in June 2004.
2. EU Partners – shared understandings
Europe and the region are joined together by history and geography. The
Mediterranean Sea has linked our peoples for centuries. A growing number
of EU citizens have origins in the countries of the region. It is in
our shared interest to build a common zone of peace, prosperity and
progress.
The EU and its partners in the region share two major principles in
respect of the proposed strategy:
-
in order to
be credible, the strategic partnership must be the subject of effective
consultation with the region. Its success depends in the first place on
the countries themselves who must feel a sense of “ownership” of the
initiative. Governments, the Arab League, regional organisations and
civil society all have a role to play in this common endeavour
-
the
strategic partnership must also include a strong commitment to the
resolution of the Arab-Israeli conflict and a strong re-iteration of the
Union’s intention to remain fully engaged on this question
Discussions to date have, in addition, revealed a number of other shared
perspectives in respect of the proposed EU strategy including the
following:
·
partnership should be a cornerstone of the strategy
·
the primary focus of the strategic partnership will be the countries of
North Africa and the Middle East
·
the strategy should take account of differentiation and the requirements
of individual countries in the region – this is not a one size fits all
approach
·
the strategy should take due account of the question of Iraq when
addressing concerns in the region
·
the strategy should aim to build on existing structures where they exist
- the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership, cooperation with the GCC etc. –
and, should the need arise, we should reflect upon new structures for
those countries with which no bilateral or regional framework exists
·
there are shared security concerns which we should tackle in a spirit of
partnership; we should adopt a broad concept of security which
addresses domestic concerns in the region e.g. unemployment and
economic underdevelopment
·
the strategy should encourage progress towards democracy and respect for
human rights
·
significant populations with origins in the region live in Europe - this
is an important factor in our relations
·
the engagement should be long-term and coherent with pragmatic
implementation
3. The challenges facing the countries of the region
While different countries face different challenges, there are
particular challenges facing the majority of countries in the region.
These are well known and have been extensively set out elsewhere,
including in the relevant UNDP Human Development Reports. Political,
economic and social reform is required in order to meet these
challenges. Such reforms cannot be imposed from outside. They must be
generated from within. The key impetus for movement is the high
expectations of a predominantly young population – more than half of
those living in the region are under eighteen. They need education and
jobs. Political stability requires that these young people can achieve
a stake in their society. How to achieve this is the major challenge
facing the governments of the region.
4. How is the EU currently engaged in the region ?
Although the EU has a Common Strategy for the Mediterranean region,
there is currently no overarching set of objectives governing the EU’s
relations with all the countries concerned by this report. There is
general agreement that we should differentiate between the Mediterranean
countries, where we have a solid and substantial set of co-operation
activities in place, and elsewhere in the region where our framework for
relations is generally less substantial, e.g. east of Jordan. We should
work on parallel tracks seeking articulation between our actions in the
region where appropriate.
The development of an EU strategic partnership for the region should
provide a set of objectives and principles through which the
developments outlined below in respect of the countries of the region
can be carried forward.
Middle East Peace Process (MEPP)
The Middle East Peace Process is also a major preoccupation of the EU’s
external relations policy. A commitment to finding a solution to this
conflict is highlighted in the EU Security Strategy. The Union is active
in seeking a peaceful settlement, including through its presence in the
Quartet and in a variety of other fora. In order to contribute better
to the resolution of the conflict the Council has appointed an EU
Special Representative to the MEPP.
The EU reiterates its commitment to regional economic reconstruction.
Progress on the resolution of the Middle East conflict cannot be a
pre-condition for confronting the urgent reform challenges facing the
countries of the region, nor vice versa. But it is clear that it will
not be possible to build a common zone of peace, prosperity and progress
unless a just and lasting settlement of the conflict is in place. The
lack of clear prospects for peace is already making it harder for
reformers in the region to succeed.
The countries of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership - Europe’s
neighbours
Europe’s ancient links with its immediate neighbourhood (Morocco,
Algeria, Tunisia, Jordan, Egypt, Israel, Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, the
Palestinian Authority and the soon to accede countries Cyprus and Malta)
found new expression in the EuroMediterranean Partnership (EMP) created
in 1995.
EMP – a comprehensive framework
Created in the wake of positive developments in the Middle East Peace
Process, the objectives of the EMP include fostering a relationship
covering political and security dialogue, economic relations, including
the creation of a Free Trade Area (FTA), and social and human
relations. Political dialogue under the EMP offers opportunities to
discuss WMD, terrorism and human rights and the EU has been developing
policies over recent years for the conduct of these talks. It remains
the only forum where Israel, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority
(and Libya, currently as observer) sit together.
The creation of a free trade area, together with substantial financial
support to promote modernisation, is a key aspect of the EMP. The EU
has now signed Association Agreements with all but one of the
Mediterranean partners. When the full ring of Association Agreements is
in force the North-South free trade framework will be in place. The
relationships established through the Association Agreements have also
helped the countries achieve important successes in the area of economic
reform. These include the adoption of fiscal and sectoral reforms
(transport, financial services and telecommunications); upgrading of
manufacturing industry; and promotion of regional integration by
adopting common rules of origin. It is envisaged that the work on
sub-regional south-south integration, e.g. through the recently signed
Agadir Agreement, will be built upon.
The EU is the most important regional economic power and the dominant
trade partner in the region. In addition the EU contributes between
€800M-€1bn per annum in MEDA programme and other support. Including EIB
loans the EU’s financial assistance to the region approaches €3 billion
per year.
Co-ordination of different EU financial instruments will make them more
effective, with funds and technical assistance flowing more rapidly and
more effectively.
Neighbourhood Policy – Deepening the EMP
The EU’s Neighbourhood Policy will deepen relations with countries in
the EMP and will be a valuable instrument in the Union’s continued
engagement with these partners. Through it the EU can offer a more
intensive political dialogue and greater access to EU programmes and
policies, including the Single Market, as well as reinforced
co-operation on justice and home affairs. Such close and co-operative
relations will depend on a better mutual understanding of security
concerns and the strengthening of commitments to common values and
common principles. It will be important to discuss issues such as
positive conditionality and incentives as the Action Plans envisaged
under the Neighbourhood Policy are developed in the coming period. In
contact with our partners in the region, we should clearly situate the
Neighbourhood Action Plans in the context of a reinforcement of the
Barcelona Process. The policy, based on country differentiation,
represents an essential plank in the implementation of the strategic
partnership as it relates to the Mediterranean countries.
Follow-up to the Naples Ministerial: reflection on EMP
Further reflection on the EMP is taking place in line with the mandate
set out by Ministers at the Naples Ministerial. The aim here is also to
enhance the effectiveness of the partnership.
Libya
Following its announcement on WMD last December relations with Libya are
set to improve (particularly if progress can be made on resolving
outstanding issues with individual Member States) and eventual
membership of Libya in the EMP will hopefully follow.
Mauritania
Mauritania is a member of the Arab Maghreb Union, a significant regional
organisation within the geographical scope of the initiative, and one in
which several other EMP members are participants. Mauritania will be
included in the current initiative taking full account of existing
instruments, i.e. the Cotonu Agreement and the structures emanating from
it.
Countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council
The EU’s relationship through its Cooperation Agreement with the
countries of the GCC (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Bahrain, Oman and
Qatar) is currently focussed primarily on trade and economic issues.
Negotiations on an FTA are ongoing. There is a clear need for a broader
agenda. The Cooperation Agreement has allowed for a limited political
dialogue, but this has not reflected the strategic significance of the
countries involved. This dialogue should be broadened, deepened and
become more inter-active. There is a need also for greater dialogue
with the individual countries of the GCC.
Yemen
There is already a Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) with Yemen and
a formal political dialogue is likely to commence this year.
Iran
With Iran there are negotiations pending for a TCA and a parallel
political agreement. The EU has also engaged in a “Comprehensive
Dialogue” and a “Human Rights Dialogue” with Iran.
Iraq
There are no formal relations with Iraq though preparations are underway
for a Medium-Term Strategy, which will make proposals for future
relations with a sovereign Iraqi government. The EU plays a role in
supporting reconstruction in particular through the World Bank and the
UN.
5. What should be the EU’s overarching objectives in dealing with
the region?
The EU’s overall engagement could be underpinned by a series of
overarching objectives and principles in line inter alia with the
European Security Strategy. These should take into account concerns for
the security of the region and for that of the Union itself.
Eleven Union Objectives and Principles
Eleven Key Objectives and Principles of the Union in respect of the
strategy might include the
following:
1.
The primary
objective is to promote the development, through partnership, of a
common zone of peace, prosperity and progress. The goal is to enjoy
close and co-operative relations responding as far as possible to
demands from within the region.
2.
The
partnership strategy will include, primarily, relations between the EU
and the countries of North Africa and the Middle East
3.
Resolution
of the Arab-Israeli conflict will be a strategic priority. Neither
progress on the MEPP nor reform in the region should be a precondition
for the other. Both are desirable in their own right and should be
pursued in partnership with equal determination
4.
Partnership
should involve a long term and sustained engagement
5.
Partnership
requires a strengthening of the Union’s political dialogue with the
region
6.
The EU will
avail of opportunities provided through the dialogue in partnership to
promote its concerns regarding respect for human rights and the rule of
law
7.
The EU will
avail itself of opportunities provided through partnership with the
countries of the region to promote action and cooperation on terrorism,
WMD and non-proliferation
8.
The EU will
work in partnership to support internally driven reforms in the
economic, political and social spheres through engagement with state and
civil actors bearing in mind the framework of the relevant UNDP Human
Development reports in terms of advancing knowledge (education), freedom
(governance) and women’s empowerment
9.
The EU will
promote enhanced security dialogue with the region including through its
own initiatives aimed at Mediterranean partners within the framework of
the ESDP on the one hand, and through exchanges of views within the fora
linking NATO and the European Union on the other
10.
Modernisation of the regulatory environment, and liberalisation of
import and export trade, will facilitate the EU to promote WTO
membership for countries of the region and will contribute to the
improvement of the business environment.
11.
The EU will
also work closely with the US, the UN and other external actors in
pursuit of these goals
The EU will implement its strategy for the region primarily through
existing instruments and, where appropriate, new instruments. The
principal idea is to reinforce the existing instruments on which our
partnership with the Mediterranean and the Middle East are based, in
co-ordination with the countries in the region, through the development
by the appropriate EU institutions of Work Programmes for the countries
involved covering political, security, economic and social spheres. The
Work Programme for the Mediterranean countries should draw on the
implementation of the EU’s Neighbourhood Policy.
The EU will reflect on the implications any increase in the level of our
ambition in the region will have for existing resources both financial
and human.
Consultation with the Region
It is envisaged that there would be active consultation with our
partners in the region in the coming months on shared objectives and
principles of our partnership efforts and on elements for the Work
Programmes to accomplish these.
The Presidency, the High Representative and the Commission should make
use of contacts with Arab partners, including at the Summit of the
League of Arab States in Tunis, 29-30 March, 2004, to present our vision
and to encourage a locally owned approach on the questions covered by
this strategy.
Full use should be made of bilateral opportunities to intensify this
dialogue in the coming months including through the Euro-Mediterranean
Partnership Mid-Term Ministerial Meeting on 5-6 May 2004 and at the
EU-GCC Ministerial meeting on 18 May 2004.
6. How do we ensure complementarity with other external actors in
the region?
Greater Middle East Initiative
The US has been promoting an initiative for the region over the last two
years, in particular through keynote speeches by President Bush and
other senior administration figures. The US proposals centre on the
“Greater Middle East” (incorporating Pakistan and Afghanistan) and focus
on democratisation, economic reform and education working primarily in a
programmatic manner. The US has proposed joint declarations on the
region at three major June Summits (EU-US, G8 and NATO).
An EU response
While the Union should continue to pursue its own distinct strategy, we
should welcome the possibility to work together and to co-ordinate with
the US in the framework of the Transatlantic Partnership. The Union
should define a complementary but distinct approach. The Union should
adopt a proactive approach on this matter. The Presidency, High
Representative and the Commission should maintain active engagement with
the US in the lead up to June.
G8 Summit (Sea Island, 8-10 June, 2004)
In the G8 process a Declaration on a Common Future has been suggested.
It is envisaged that this might respond to a statement at the Tunis Arab
League Summit. It is also envisaged that the elements in this paper
might be drawn on by the EU G8 members, the Commission and the
Presidency.
EU-US Summit (26 June, 2004)
At the EU-US Summit both parties could spell out their shared readiness
to assist the countries of the region in their efforts to bring about
political, economic and social development. We could set out the extent
of our individual efforts in this regard and stress our determination to
work together, including through our parallel dialogue with the
countries of the region.
NATO Summit (Istanbul, 28-29 June, 2004)
At the NATO Summit, NATO is likely to present a set of initiatives aimed
at strengthening its Mediterranean Dialogue and offering countries in
the Middle East proposals in the field of security. The Summit could
call for an EU-NATO dialogue within the relevant fora (NAC/PSC) on their
respective initiatives.
7. Conclusion
The EU needs to raise the level of its engagement with the region. It
is an area of enormous strategic significance for Europe. It faces
serious challenges requiring political, economic and social reform. The
drive and initiative to take on these challenges and to implement the
necessary reforms must come from within the region itself. The Union
must work in partnership with the region to help it meet these
challenges. Our goal should be to create a common zone of peace,
prosperity and progress. The Union should adopt a set of guiding
principles for its engagement and implement these primarily through
sharpening the focus of existing instruments and ensuring coherence
between them. Success in this endeavour will be of mutual benefit to
Europe and the region.
|